I think people don’t like it when I turn their comments into posts, but I fear that comments get lost in the tiny itty bitty little bottom section of the post as I keep blogging, so this comment by Baz gets its own post. It’s in response to my article Ugandan Women Writers Shine But Where Are the Men? Hope you don’t mind Baz.

Your article started off suspicious. You said my friend Monica was “the first Ugandan to receive such prestigious international literary recognition of late”. But just a couple of years ago Doreen Baingana received a Commonwealth prize. Your article therefore started off sounding as if you either did not really know your material, or were willing to shoehorn facts into spaces they didn’t fit just so that you can make your agenda.

I hold by my statement. The Caine prize is a MUCH bigger deal than the Commonwealth Prize. Also, it was some years ago that Baingana won the award, so this is factually true, in my opinion, on two accounts.

After reading the article, I am still not sure which of the two it is. Are you ignorant, or unscrupulous?

I’d like to think I’m neither. And I’m sorry my article made you so angry, but is name calling really necessary?

Because you seem to be working hard to make the word “writers” exclude men.
Jackee (isn’t that how she spells her name?) speaks of Ugandan stories that need telling, and mentions Uganda’s literary voice. How do you make this sound as if this quote excludes all the guys who she used to write with here before she left Kampala?


I don’t believe that that is what she said, because she was right here with us – men and women – all writing, a voice in unison, without discrimination.

I don’t make it sound as if Jackee (and yes, I did get the ee’s wrong – I admit when I’m wrong) said that she’s excluding men. QUOTE JACKEE: (not in the article, in my notes), “Men aren’t writing.”

“For once the women are at the head of the pack and the men are limping behind” is a patently ludicrous statement. It implies that for a long time all the piles of books that were written in Uganda were authored by men, and that even though women tried to break into this strict and rigid club, they were not been permitted to. Perhaps by institutionalised sexism.

This is just not true. Uganda has never been a literary powerhouse, male-dominated or otherwise. And don’t cite the Okot P’Bitek days. The authors from those days can be counted off one hand. That doesn’t count as a pack.

Okay, but the authors you counted on the one hand – which would probably be a pack in that they probably worked together and knew each other – were all men.

If we have a rising number of Ugandans writing literary fiction today, it is not a renaissance. It is a beginning. This is not an old pack changing leadership. It is a new pack.

Agree with you there.

And it is not even an all-female pack. Who told you that women are the only ones writing? Ejiet? Ejiet is talking through his ass. There are scores and scores of young male writers who spend whole nights at keyboards if they can, and, if they can’t, they stay awake scratching on notebooks with ballpens. These men are as sincere, keen and driven as Ms Batanda and Ms Arac De Nyeko (Not “Ms Arac” by the way) ever were. I know this because I know them.

Okay, maybe they are writing, but they aren’t winning prizes, they aren’t getting international recognition, they aren’t up there the way the women are – they aren’t even getting published. (Which leads us to your next point…)

The reason you have not heard of them is probably because they have not been published by Femrite. The reason they have not been published by Femrite is they are not women.

But what other avenues do they have? Fountain? Fountain is a business, not a charity. It doesn’t get grants to publish books that don’t have a market. You spoke to Alex, and he told you.

You have more published literary work by women because the people who publish literary work publish women, not because men don’t write. You can draw out the logic and see: Femrite doesn’t prove your argument, it destroys it.

So, to be more correct, maybe I should have said, the men are writing, but they aren’t getting the acclaim that women are getting because Fountain isn’t publishing them and Femrite isn’t pushing them. But then it would certainly have sounded like a Femrite puff piece, wouldn’t have it?

Femrite, bless them, are just trying to do what they think is right. It is their company and they can publish who they want. And reject whichever gender they don’t want. But for all the stuff they have published (some of it good, some of it crap) the fact remains that every Ugandan author who has achieved significant recognition over the past several years has published outside Uganda.

Baingana and Moses Isegawa are the best examples, Arac De Nyeko also illustrates this.

But even if you use international literary recognition” as the measure of whether one gender is writing or not, you still have a problem: Over the past few years we have had our Baingana and our De Nyeko. But you also have Moses Isegawa

Yes, you have Isegawa, but he doesn’t even live in or venture to Uganda. And he’s one Ugandan male author, and Baingana and De Nyeko are two women. So two against one. And there are other women too – Goretti is published outside Uganda, but I can’t think of another man…

Everyone keeps picking up on the one quote by Ejiet, but there was a whole damn article I wrote that no one seems to pay that much attention to the rest of. I’m sorry Ejiet said the thing about politics, bars, and money, and I’m even more sorry Monitor used it as a pull quote, but I wonder if there’s some truth in it.

Okay, that’s enough for now.

***PS: I wrote a longer version of this article which Monitor cut, but I’m submitting it to Poets and Writers Magazine in the States (so I can’t post it here until I hear back from them) which does mention Isegawa.